Мышечная сила у мышевидных грызунов различной экологической специализации

СОДЕРЖАНИЕ

ВВЕДЕНИЕ 3
1. ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ ………………………………………………….. 5
1.1. Общая характеристика отряда Rodentia………………………………. 5
1.2. Экологическая специализация Rodentia………………………………. 8
1.2.1. Экоморфологические адаптации роющих грызунов………………. 8
1.2.2. Экоморфологические адаптации наземных грызунов…………….. 11
1.2.3. Экоморфологические адаптации планирующих грызунов……….. 12
1.2.4. Экоморфологические адаптации полуводных грызунов………… 13
1.3. Роль грызунов в инжиниринге экосистем…………………………… 14
1.4. Методы оценки мышечной силы грызунов in vivo………………….. 15
2. МЕТОДЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ…………………………………………… 20
3. РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ И ОБСУЖДЕНИЕ………………………………………. 22
ВЫВОДЫ……………………………………………………………………. 45
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ…………………………………………………... 46

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

1. Clark K.L. Bioturbation by mammals and fire interact to alter ecosystem–level nutrient dynamics in longleaf pine forests/ Clark K.L., BranchL.C., Farrington J.// PLoS One.– 2018.– N 13(8).–P.e0201137.
2.Yang Y. Pocket gopher disturbance slows soil carbon accumulation in abandoned agricultural lands/ Yang Y., Knops J.M.H., Brassil C.E.// Ecology.– 2022.– N 103(4).–P.e3627.
3. Zhang Y. Burrowing rodents as ecosystem engineers: the ecology and management of plateau zokors Myospalax fontanierii in alpine meadow ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau/ Zhang Y., Zhang Z., Liu J.// Mammal. Rev. –2003.– N 33 (3).–P. 284–294.
4. Seed value influences cache pilfering rates by desert rodents /Vander Wall S.B., Dimitri L.A., Longland W.S., White J.D.M.//Integr. Zool.– 2019.– N 14(1).–P.75–86.
5. Blackwell G. Rodent and predator population dynamics in an eruptive system/ Blackwell G., Potter M., Minot E.// Ecol. Modell.–2001.– N 142(3).– P. 227–245.
6. Oli M. K. Population cycles of small rodents are caused by specialist predators: or are they?/ Oli M. K.// Trends Ecol. Evol.– 2003.– N 18(3).– P. 105–107.
7. De la Cruz–Guarneros N. Assessing effects of chronic heavy metal exposure through a multibiomarker approach: the case of Liomys irroratus (Rodentia: Heteromyidae)/ De la Cruz–Guarneros N., Tovar–Sánchez E., Mussali–Galante P.// Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. – 2021.– N 39.– P.55373–55387.
8. Common vole (Microtus arvalis) ecology and management: implications for risk assessment of plant protection products/ Jacob J., Manson P., Barfknecht R., Fredricks T.// Pest. Manag. Sci. –2014.– N 70(6).– P. 869–878.
9. Imholt C. Establishment and validation of microsampling techniques in wild rodents for ecotoxicological research/ Imholt C., Abdulla T., Stevens A.// J. Appl. Toxicol.– 2018.– N 38(9). –P. 1244–1250.
10. Muscular strength decrease in Rattus norvegicus experimentally infected by Toxocara canis/ Chieffi P.P., Aquino R.T.R., Paschoalotti M.A. [et al.].//Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. S. Paulo.– 2009.– N 51(2).–P.73–75.
11. A hacked kitchen scale–based system for quantification of grip strength in rodents/ Homolak J., Virag D., Kodvanj I. [et al.].//Comput. Biol. Med. – 2022.– N 144.– P.105391.
12. Impaired neuromuscular function by conjoint actions of organophosphorus insecticide metabolites omethoate and cyclohexanol with implications for treatment of respiratory failure/ Dissanayake K.N., Chou R.C.C., Thompson A. [et al.].// Clin. Toxicol. (Phila).– 2021.– N 59(12).–P.1239–1258.
13. Biochemical, histological, and memory impairment effects of chronic copper toxicity: a model for non–Wilsonian brain copper toxicosis in Wistar rat/ Pal A., Badyal R.K., Vasishta R.K. [et al.].//Biol. Trace. Elem. Res.– 2013.– N 153(1–3).–P.257–268.
14. Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor)–derived protein supplementation attenuates skeletal muscle atrophy in hindlimb casting immobilized rats/ Lee J.B., Kwon D.K., Jeon Y.J., Song Y.J.//Chin. J. Physiol.– 2021.– N 64(5).–P.211–217.
15. Branched–chain amino acids reduce hindlimb suspension–induced muscle atrophy and protein levels of atrogin–1 and MuRF1 in rats/Maki T., Yamamoto D., Nakanishi S. [et al.]. // Nutr. Res.– 2012.– N 32(9). –P.676–83.
16. Estrogen receptor beta is involved in skeletal muscle hypertrophy induced by the phytoecdysteroid ecdysterone/ Parr M.K., Zhao P., Haupt O. [et al.].//Mol. Nutr. Food Res.– 2014.– N 58(9).– P.1861–1872.
17. Effects of ovarian hormones and estrogen receptor α on physical activity and skeletal muscle fatigue in female mice/Cabelka C.A., Baumann C.W., Collins B.C. [et al.].// Exp. Gerontol.– 2019.– N 115.– P.155–164.
18. The oestrous cycle and skeletal muscle atrophy: Investigations in rodent models of muscle loss/ Rosa–Caldwell M.E., Mortreux M., Kaiser U.B. [et al.].// Exp. Physiol.– 2021.– N 106(12). –P.2472–2488.
19. Molecular genetic evidence for the place of origin of the Pacific rat, Rattus exulans/ Thomson V., Aplin K.P., Cooper A. [et al.].//PLoS One.– 2014.– N 9(3).– P.e91356.
20. Puckett E.E. Commensal rats and humans: integrating rodent phylogeography and zooarchaeology to highlight connections between human societies/ Puckett E., Orton D., Munshi–South J.//Bioessays.– 2020.– N 42(5).– P. e1900160.
21. Carleton M.D. Order Rodentia/Carleton M.D., Musser, G.G. // Mammal species of the world. A. Taxonomic, geographic reference/ Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M. (Eds.).– Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.– P. 745–752.
22. Morris P.J.R. The biomechanical significance of the elongated rodent incisor root in the mandible during incision/ Morris P.J.R.,, Cox P.G., Cobb S.N.F.// Sci. Rep. – 2022.– N 12 (1).–P. 3819.
23. Samuels J.X. Cranial morphology and dietary habits of rodents/ Samuels J.X.// Zool. J. Linn. Soc. –2009.– N 156(4).–P. 864–888.
24. Functional evolution of the feeding system in rodents/ Cox P.G., Rayfield E.J., Fagan M.J. [et al.].//PLoS One.– 2012.– N 7(4).–P. e36299.
25. Cox P.G. Reviewing the morphology of the jaw–closing musculature in squirrels, rats, and guinea pigs with contrast–enhanced microCT/ Cox P.G., Jeffery N.// Anat. Rec. (Hoboken).– 2011.– N 294(6).– P.915–928.
26. Ryan J.M. Comparative morphology and evolution of cheek pouches in rodents/ Ryan J.M.//J. Morphol.– 1986.– N 190(1).– P.27–41.
27. Derived muscle arrangements and their shared innervation patterns of external and internal cheek pouches in rodents/ Kawashima T., Thorington R.W. Jr., Bohaska P.W., Sato F.//Anat. Histol. Embryol.– 2020.– N 49(1).–P.38–50.
28. Coprophagy prevention alters microbiome, metabolism, neurochemistry, and cognitive behavior in a small mammal/ Bo T.B., Zhang X.Y., Kohl K.D. [et al.].//ISME J.– 2020.– N 14(10).–P.2625–2645.
29. Landry S.O. Jr. The Rodentia as omnivores / Landry S.O. Jr.// Q. Rev. Biol. – 1970.– N45 (4).–P. 351–372.
30. Matějů J. Sexual size dimorphism in ground squirrels (Rodentia: Sciuridae: Marmotini) does not correlate with body size and sociality/ Matějů J., Kratochvíl L.// Front. Zool.– 2013.– N 10(1). –P.27.
31. Bondrup–Nielsen S. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in microtines: Are females larger than males or are males smaller than females?/ Bondrup–Nielsen S., Ims R. A.// Evol. Ecol.–1990.– N 4(3).–P. 261–272.
32. Zenuto R. R. Sexual size dimorphism, testes size and mating system in two populations of Ctenomys talarum (Rodentia: Octodontidae)/ Zenuto R. R. // J. Nat. Hist. –1999.– N 33(2).– P. 305–314.
34. Thorley J. A unified–models analysis of the development of sexual size dimorphism in Damaraland mole–rats, Fukomys damarensis/ Thorley J., Clutton–Brock T.H.// J. Mammal. –2019.– N 100(4).–P. 1374–1386.
35. Function‐related drivers of skull morphometric variation and sexual size dimorphism in a subterranean rodent, Plateau Zokor (Eospalax baileyi)/ Su J., Hegab I.M., Ji W., Nan Z.// Ecol. Evol.– 2018.– N 8(9).–P. 4631–4643.
36. Borkowska A. Promiscuity, male reproductive success and mate relatedness in a natural population of the common vole/ Borkowska A., Ratkiewicz O.// J. Zoo.– 2010.– N 280(2).–P.195 – 201
37. Schulte–Hostedde A. I. Chapter 10: Sexual Size Dimorphism in Rodents/ Schulte–Hostedde A. I.// Rodent societies: an ecological and evolutionary perspective/ Wolff J.O., Sherman P.W. (eds.).– Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.– P. 117–119.
38. Holmes M.M. Social behavior in naked mole–rats: individual differences in phenotype and proximate mechanisms of mammalian eusociality/Holmes M.M., Goldman B.D.//Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.– 2021.– N1319.–P.35–58.
39. Hare J. F. Catch the wave: prairie dogs assess neighbours' awareness using contagious displays//Hare J.F., Campbell K.L., Senkiw R.W.//Proc. Biol. Sci. – 2014.– N 281(1777).–P.20132153.
40. Campbell–Palmer R. Captive care and welfare considerations for beavers/Campbell–Palmer R., Rosell F.//Zoo. Biol.– 2015.–N 34(2).–P.101–109.
41. Громов B.C. Эпигенетическое программирование фенотипических различий в поведении и эволюция социальности у грызунов/ Громов B.C.// Успехи современной биологии.– 2020.– № 1.–C. 58–72.
42. Interplay between postcranial morphology and locomotor types in Neotropical sigmodontine rodents/ Carrizo L.V., Tulli M.J., Santos D.A.D., AbdalaV.// J. Anat.– 2014.–N 224(4).–P.469–481.
43. Femoral morphology of sciuromorph rodents in light of scaling and locomotor ecology// Wölfer J., Amson E., Arnold P. [et al.].//J. Anat..– 2019.– N 234(6).–P.731–747.
44. Zhang S.Y. Fossorial Damaraland mole rats do not exhibit a blunted hypercapnic ventilatory response// Zhang S.Y., Pamenter M.E.//Biol. Lett.– 2019.–N15(3).–P.20190006.
45. Sprenger R.J. Respiratory development in burrowing rodents: Effect of perinatal hypercapnia/ Sprenger R.J., Milsom W.K.// Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.– 2021.– N 288.–P.103640.
46. Morgan C.C. Carpal–metacarpal specializations for burrowing in South American octodontoid rodents/ Morgan C.C.,Verzi L.H.//J. Anat. – 2011. –N 219(2).–P.167–175.
47. Elissamburu A. Forelimb proportions and fossorial adaptations in the scratch–digging rodent Ctenomys (Caviomorpha)/ Elissamburu A., Santis L.// J. Mammal.– 2011.– N 92(3).–P. 683–689.
48. Echeverría A.I. Functional morphology and identity of the thenar pad in the subterranean genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Caviomorpha)/ Echeverría A.I., Abdala V., Longo M.V., Vassallo A.I.// J. Anat.– 2019.–N 235(5).–P.940–952.
49. Stein B. R. Morphology of subterranean rodents/ Stein B. R. // Life underground: the biology of subterranean rodents/ Lacey E. A., Patton J. L., Cameron G.N. (eds.).– Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 2000.–P. 19–61.
50. McIntosh A.F. The impact of gape on the performance of the skull in chisel–tooth digging and scratch digging mole–rats (Rodentia: Bathyergidae)/ McIntosh A.F., Cox P.G.// R. Soc. Open. Sci.– 2016.–N 3(10).–P.160568.
51. McIntosh A.F. The impact of digging on craniodental morphology and integration/ McIntosh A.F., Cox P.G.// J. Evol. Biol.– 2016.–N 29(12).–P.2383–2394.
52. Samuels J. X. Craniodental adaptations for digging in extinct burrowing beavers/ Samuels J. X., Valkenburgh B. V.// J. Vertebr. Paleontol.– 2009.– N 29(1).–P. 254–268.
53. McIntosh A.F. The impact of digging on the evolution of the rodent mandible/ McIntosh A.F., Cox P.G.// J. Morphol.– 2019.–N 280(2).–P.176–183.
54. Cox P.G. Masticatory musculature of the African mole–rats (Rodentia: Bathyergidae)/ Cox P.G., Faulkes C.G., Bennett N.C.// PeerJ.– 2020.–N 8.–P.e8847.
55. Kalthoff D.C. Biomechanical adaptations for burrowing in the incisor enamel microstructure of Geomyidae and Heteromyidae (Rodentia: Geomyoidea)/Kalthoff D.C,. Mörs T.//Ecol. Evol.– 2021.–N 11(14).–P.9447–9459.
56. Nevo E. Mosaic evolution of subterranean mammals: regression, progression and global convergence/ Nevo E.– New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.– 413 p.
57. Doubell N.S. Comparative forelimb morphology of scratch–digging and chisel–tooth digging African mole–rat species/ Doubell N.S., Sahd L., Kotzé S.H.//J. Morphol.– 2020.– N 281(9).–P.1029–1046.
58. Rankin J.W. Functional capacity of kangaroo rat hindlimbs: adaptations for locomotor performance/ Rankin J.W., Doney K.M., McGowan C.P.//J. R. Soc. Interface.– 2018.– N 15(144).–P. 20180303.
59. Schwaner M. J. Jumping mechanics of desert kangaroo rats./Schwaner, M.J., Lin D.C., McGowan C. P.//J. Exp. Biol.– 2018.– N 221(22).–P. jeb186700.
60. Ross C.D. Immunohistochemistry of kangaroo rat hindlimb muscles/ Ross C.D., Meyers R.A. // Anat. Rec. (Hoboken).– 2022.–N 305(6).–P.1435–1447.
61. Christensen B.A. Elastic energy storage across speeds during steady–state hopping of desert kangaroo rats (Dipodomys deserti)/ Christensen B.A., Lin D.C., Schwaner M.J., McGowan C.P.// J. Exp. Biol.– 2022.– N 225(2).–P.jeb242954.
62. Multiple phylogenetically distinct events shaped the evolution of limb skeletal morphologies associated with bipedalism in the jerboas/ Moore T.J., Organ C.L., Edwards S.V. [et al.].//Curr. Biol.– 2015.– N 25(21).–P. 2785–2794.
63. Phylogenetic and morphological significance of an overlooked flying squirrel (Pteromyini, Rodentia) from the eastern Himalayas with the description of a new genus/ Li Q., Cheng F., Jackson S.M. [et al.].// Zool. Res.– 2021.– N 42(4).–P.389–400.
64. Evolutionary transformation of the palmaris longus muscle in flying squirrels (Pteromyini: Sciuridae): An anatomical consideration of the origin of the uniquely specialized styliform cartilage/ Kawashima T., Thorington R. W., Bohaska P. W., Sato F.//Anat. Rec.– 2016. – N 300(2).–P. 340–352.
65. Thorington R.V.Jr. Anatomy of the squirrel wrist: bones, ligaments, and muscles/ Thorington R.V.Jr., Darrow K.// J. Morphol.– 2000.– N 246(2).–P.85–102.
66. Biochemical adaptations to dive–derived hypoxia/reoxygenation in semiaquatic rodents/ Sergina S., Antonova E., Ilyukha V. [et al.].// Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, Biochem. Mol. Biol.–2015.– N 190.–P. 37–45.
67. Возрастные и сезонные изменения антиоксидантной защиты мышечной ткани и морфометрических параметров эритроцитов у ондатры (Оndatra zibethicus)/ Антонова Е. П., Илюха В.А., Кижина А.Г. [ и др.].// Журнал эволюционной биохимии и физиологии.– 2020.– № 5.–C. 359–367.
68. García–Esponda C. M. Hindlimb musculature of the largest living rodent Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (Caviomorpha): Adaptations to semiaquatic and terrestrial styles of life/ García–Esponda C.M., Candela A.M.// J. Morphol.– 2015.– N 277(3).–P. 286–305.
69. Mayer M. Landscape structure and population density affect intraspecific aggression in beavers//Mayer M., Aparicio E.C., Windels S.K., Rosell F.N.//Ecol. Evol.– 2020.– N 10(24).–P.13883–13894.
70. Kielland K. Moose herbivory in taiga: effects on biogeochemistry and vegetation dynamics in primary succession/ Kielland K., Bryant J.P.// Oikos. –1998.–N 82.– P. 377–383.
71. Alba–Lynn C. Interactive disturbance effects of two disparate ecosystem engineers in North American shortgrass steppe/ Alba–Lynn C., Detling J.K.// Oecologia.– 2008.– N 157(2).– P.269–278.
72. Thorn C.E. Gopher disturbance: its variability by Braun–Blanquet vegetation units in the Niwot Ridge alpine tundra zone, Colorado Front Range, USA/ Thorn C.E. //Arctic and Alpine Research.–1982.–N 14.–P. 45–51.
73. Subterranean desert rodents (Genus Ctenomys) create soil patches enriched in root endophytic fungal propagules/ Miranda V., Rothen C., Yela N. [et al.].// Microb. Ecol.– 2019.– N 77(2).– P.451–459.
74. Stephens R.B. The underappreciated role of rodent generalists in fungal spore dispersal networks/ Stephens R.B., Rowe R.J.// Ecology.– 2020.– N 101(4).–P.e02972.



75. Dalbeck L. A review of the influence of beaver Castor fiber on amphibian assemblages in the floodplains of European temperate streams and rivers/ Dalbeck L., Hachtel M., Campbell‐Palmer R.// Herpetol. J.– 2020.– N 30.– P. 134–145.
76. Rewilding wetlands: Beaver as agents of within‐habitat heterogeneity and the responses of contrasting biota/ Willby N.J., Law A., Levanoni O. [et al.].// Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.–2018.– N 373(1761).– P. 20170444.
77. Stringer A.P. The impacts of beavers Castor spp. on biodiversity and the ecological basis for their reintroduction to Scotland, UK/ Stringer A.P., Gaywood M.J.// Mammal. Rev.–2016.– N 46(4).–P. 270–283.
78. Using ecosystem engineers as tools in habitat restoration and rewilding: Beaver and wetlands/ Law A., Gaywood M.J., Jones K.C. [et al.].//Sci. Total Environ.– 2017. –N 605.–P. 1021–1030.
79. Brazier R.E. Beaver: Nature's ecosystem engineers/ Brazier R.E., Puttock A., Graham H.A. [et al.].// WIREs Water.– 2021.–N 8(1).–P.e1494.
80. Beaver dams attenuate flow: A multi–site study/ Puttock A., Graham H.A., Ashe J. [et al.].// Hydrol. Process.– 2021.– N 35(2).–P.e14017.
81. Washko S. How beavers affect riverine aquatic macroinvertebrates: a review/ Washko S., Willby N., Law A.//PeerJ.– 2022.– N 10.– P.e13180.
82. Rodent–mediated seed dispersal shapes species composition and recruitment dynamics in ecotones/ Yu F., Shi X., Yi X., Ma J.// Front. Plant Sci.– 2018.– N 9. –P. 1911.
83. Hollander J.L. Effectiveness of six species of rodents as dispersers of singleleaf piñon pine (Pinus monophylla)/Hollander J.L., Vander Wall S.B.//Oecologia.– 2004.–N 138(1).–P.57–65.
84. Seed trait–mediated selection by rodents affects mutualistic interactions and seedling recruitment of co–occurring tree species/ Zhang H., Yan C., Chang G., Zhang Z.//Oecologia.– 2016.– N 180(2).–P.475–484.
85. Xiao Z. Dual ecological functions of scatter–hoarding rodents: pollinators and seed dispersers of Mucuna sempervirens (Fabaceae)/ Xiao Z.// Integr. Zool.– 2021. doi: 10.1111/1749–4877.12603. Online ahead of print.
86. Excess Coenzyme A reduces skeletal musclep and strength in mice overexpressing human PANK2/. Corbin D.R., Rehg J.E., Shepherd D.L. [et al.]. // Mol. Genet. Metab.– 2017.– N 120(4).–P. 350–362.
87. Ketogenic diet with medium–chain triglycerides restores skeletal muscle function and pathology in a rat model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy/ Fujikura Y., Sugihara H., Hatakeyama M. [et al.].// FASEB J.– 2021.–N 35(9).–P.e21861.
88. Triptolide prevents LPS–induced skeletal muscle atrophy via inhibiting NF–κB/TNF–α and regulating protein synthesis/degradation pathway/Fang W.Y., Tseng Y.T., Lee T.Y. [et al.]. //Br. J. Pharmacol.– 2021.–N 178(15).–P.2998–3016.
89. Distribution of dietary protein intake in daily meals influences skeletal muscle hypertrophy via the muscle clock/ Aoyama S., Kim H–K., Hirooka R. [et al.].// Cell Rep.– 2021.–N 36(1).–P.109336.
90. Myricanol rescues dexamethasone–induced muscle dysfunction via a sirtuin 1–dependent mechanism/ Shen S., Liao Q., Liu J. [et al.].// J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle.– 2019.– N 10(2).–P.429–444.
91. Deacon R.M.J. Measuring the strength of mice/ Deacon R.M.J.// J. Vis. Exp. –2013.–N (76).–P. 2610.
92. Bonetto A. Assessment of muscle mass and strength in mice/ Bonetto A., Andersson D.C., Waninga D.L.// Bonekey Rep.– 2015.–N 4.–P. 732.
93. A hacked kitchen scale–based system for quantification of grip strength in rodents/ Homolak J., Virag D., Kodvanj I. [et al.].// Comput. Biol. Med.– 2022.–N 144.–P.105391.
94. Three mouse models of muscular dystrophy: the natural history of strength and fatigue in dystrophin–, dystrophin/utrophin–, and laminin alpha 2–deficient mice/ Connolly A.M., Keeling R.M., Mehta S. [et al.].// Neuromuscul. Disord.– 2001.– N 11.– P. 703–712.
95. Justice J.N. Battery of behavioral tests in mice that models age–associated changes in human motor function/ Justice J. N.//Age.–2014.–N 36.–P. 583–595.
96. Brooks S. P. Tests to assess motor phenotype in mice: a user’s guide/ Brooks, S. P., Dunnett S.B.// Nat. Rev. Neurosci.– 2009.– N10.–P. 519–529.
97. Ishihara K. Improved swimming pool achieves higher reproducibility and sensitivity to effect of food components as ergogenic aids/ Ishihara K. // J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol.–2009.– N 55.–P. 301–308.
98. Modified forelimb grip strength test detects aging–associated physiological decline in skeletal muscle function in male mice/ Takeshita H., Yamamoto K., Nozato S. [et al.].// Sci.Rep.– 2017.–N 7.–P.42323.
99. Factors affecting grip strength testing/ Maurissen J.P., Marable B.R., Andrus A. K., Stebbins K. E.// Neurotoxicol. Teratol.–2003.– N 25.–P.543–553.
100. Micro–computed tomography for non–invasive evaluation of muscle atrophy in mouse models of disease/ Pasetto L., Olivari., Nardo G. [et al.].// PLoS One.–2018.– N 13(5).–P. e0198089.
101. Jourdain M. Mouse models of cancer–induced cachexia: Hind limb muscle mass and evoked force as readouts/ Jourdain M., Melly S., Summermatter S., Hatakeyama S.// Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.– 2018.–N 503(4).–P.2415–2420.
102. Automated rodent in situ muscle contraction assay and myofiber organization analysis in sarcopenia animal models/ Weber H., Rauch A., Adamski S. [et al.].// J. Appl. Physiol.–2012.–N 112.–P. 2087–2098.
103. Factors affecting grip strength testing/ Maurissen J. P., Marable B. R., Andrus A. K., Stebbins, K. E.// Neurotoxicol. Teratol.– 2003.– N 25(5).– P. 543–553.
104. Musser G.G.; Superfamily Muroidea/ Musser, G.G., Carleton M.D// Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3rd ed.)/ Wilson D.E., Reeder D.M. (eds.). – Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.– 976 p.
105. Smorkatcheva A. V. Fathers and sons: Physiological stress in male Zaisan mole voles, Ellobius tancrei/ Smorkatcheva A. V., Kondratyuk E. Y., Polikarpov I. A.// Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.–2019.– N 275.–P. 1–5.
106. Smorkatcheva A.V. Delayed dispersal in the Zaisan mole vole (Ellobius tancrei): helping or extended parental investment?/Smorkatcheva A.V., Kumaitova A.R.//J. Ethol.– 2014.–N 32.–P.53–61.
107. Slastenina E.S. The ecology and harmful activity of Ellobius talpinus on the fields and pastures of Kirgiziya/ Slastenina E.S.// Uch. Zap. Tyumenskogo. Gos. Pedagog. Inst.– 1963. –N 242.–P. 3–64.
108. SmorkatchevaV. Does sire replacement trigger plural reproduction in matrifilial groups of a singular breeder, Ellobius tancrei?/Smorkatcheva V., Kuprina K.V.// Mamm. Biol.–2018.– N 88.–p.–P.144–150.
109. Sex differences in the meiotic behavior of an XX sex chromosome pair in males and females of the mole vole Ellobius tancrei: turning an X into a Y chromosome?/Gil–Fernández A., Matveevsky S., Martín–Ruiz M.// Chromosoma.– 2021.– N 130(2–3).–P.113–131.
110. Matveevsky S. Unique sex chromosome systems in Ellobius: How do male XX chromosomes recombine and undergo pachytene chromatin inactivation?/ Matveevsky S., Bakloushinskaya I., Kolomiets O. // Sci. Rep. –2016.–N 6.–P. 29949.
111. A new form of the mole vole Ellobius tancrei Blasius, 1884 (Mammalia, Rodentia) with the lowest chromosome number/ Bakloushinskaya I., Romanenko S.A., Serdukova N.A. [et al.].// Comp. Cytogenet.– 2013.– N 7(2).–P.163–169
112. Nasal aerodynamics protects brain and lung from inhaled dust in subterranean diggers, Ellobius talpinus/ Moshkin M.P., Petrovski D.V., Akulov A.E. [et al.].// Proc. Biol. Sci.– 2014.– N281(1792).–P.20140919.
113. Новиков Е.A. Физиологическая цена адаптаций к подземному образу жизни: обыкновенная слепушонка (Ellobius Talpinus Pall.) в сравнении с наземными грызунами.: диссертация …док. биол. наук:03.00.08/ Новиков, Евгений Анатольеви.– Новосибирск. 2008.– 393 с.
114. Gromov I. Fauna of the USSR: Mammals Volume III, No. 8: Voles (Microtinae) / Gromov I., I. Polyakov. –Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Libraries and the National Science Foundation, 1992.– 383 c.
115. Monogamy as one of the ways of realization of the adaptive potential in mammals as exemplified by the steppe lemming Lagurus lagurus Pallas/ Evsikov V. I., Kokenova G. T., Zadubrovskii P. A. [et al.].// Doklady Biological Sciences.– 2006.–N 411(1).–P. 501–503.
116. Lagaria A. Аnatomical correlates to scratch digging in the forelimb of Eeuropean ground squirrels (Spermophilus citellus) / Lagaria A., Youlatos D.// J Mammal. – 2006.– N 87(3).–P. 563–570.
117. Daily torpor reduces mass and changes stress and power output of soleus and EDL muscles in the Djungarian hamster, Phodopus sungorus/ James R.S., Tallis J.A., Seebacher F., Storey K. // J. Exp. Biol.– 2011.–N 214(Pt 17).–P.2896–2902.
118. Wojciechowski M.S. Is torpor only an advantage? Effect of thermal environment on torpor use in the Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus)/ Wojciechowski V.S., Jefimow M.// J. Physiol. Pharmacol.– 2006.–N 57 (8).–P. 83–92.
119. Jefimow M. Social thermoregulation and torpor in the Siberian hamster/ Jefimow M., Glabska M., Wojciechowski M. S.// J. Exp. Biol.– 2011.–N 214(7).–P. 1100–1108.
120. Zysling D.A. Photoperiod and food restriction differentially affect reproductive and immune responses in Siberian hamsters Phodopus sungorus/ Zysling D.A., Garst A.D., Demas G.E.// Funct. Ecol.– 2009.–N 23.–P. 979–988.
121. Food restriction during development delays puberty but does not affect adult seasonal reproductive responses to food availability in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus)/ Bailey A.M., Hall C.A., Legan S.J., Demas J.E.// J. Exp. Zool. A. Ecol. Integr. Physiol.– 2021.–N 335(8).–P.691–702. doi:
122. Laundn J.W. Effects of soil structure on burrow characteristics of five small mammal species/ Laundn J.W., Reynolds T.D.//Great Basin Naturalist.–1993.– N 53(4).–P. 358–366.
123. The hypoxia adaptation of small mammals to plateau and underground burrow conditions/ Li M., Pan D., Sun H. [et al.].// Animal Model Exp. Med.–2021.–N 4(4).–P.319–328.
124. Nations J.A. Climbing behavior of northern red–backed voles (Myodes rutilus) and scansoriality in Myodes (Rodentia, Cricetidae)/ Nations J.A., Olson L.E.// J. Mammal. –2015.– N 96(5).–P.957–963.
125. Fire Effects Information System (FEIS). United States Department of Agriculture, document: "Myodes rutilus". –
URL: https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/myru/all.html.
126.Novikov E. A. Age–related differences in physiology and survival of northern red–backed voles (Myodes rutilus) in captivity/ Novikov E. A., Kondratyuk E. Y., Polikarpov I. A //Biogerontology.–2019.–N 21(2).–P. 133–142.
127. Manson J.J. Common vole (Microtus arvalis) ecology and management: implications for risk assessment of plant protection products/ Manson J.J., Barfknecht P. R., Fredricks T.//Pest. Manag. Sci.– 2014.–N 70(6).–P.869–878.
128. Lantová P. Food selection in Microtus arvalis: the role of plant functional traits/ Lantová P., Lanta V.// Ecol. Res. –2009.–N 24(4).–P.831–838
129. Revision of the taxonomic position of the Olkhon mountain vole (Rodentia, Cricetidae)/ Bodrov S.Y., Kostygov A.Y., Rudneva L.V. [et al.].// Biol. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.–2016.– N 43.–P. 136.
130. Современный ареал тувинской полевки Alticola tuvinicus Ognev, 1950 (обзор экологических условий и моделирование)/ Абрамов С. А., Лопатина Н. В., Моролдоев И. В., Литвинов Ю. Н.// Сибирский экологический журнал.– 2009.– № 5.– C.550–563.
131. Pozdnyakov A. Morphotypical variability of the flat–headed vole (Alticola strelzowi, Rodentia, Arvicolinae)/ Pozdnyakov A., Abramov S.A., Lopatina N., Litvinov Y.N.//Zoologicheskiĭ Zhurnal.– 2017.– N 96(10).–P.1267–1278.
132. Огнев С. И. Звери СССР и прилежащих стран. Т.7./ Огнев С. И.– M–Л, 1950. – 736 с.
133. Задубровский П.А. Поведение неполовозрелых скальных полевок двух видов (Alticola strelzowi и A. tuvinicus) в тесте “открытое поле”/Задубровский П.А., Степанова А.В., Лопатина Н.В.,Литвинов Ю.Н. // Сибирский экологический журнал.– 2017.– № 3..– С. 257–263.
134. Левенец Я.В. Сравнительный анализ стереотипного поведения на примере процесса охоты у мелких млекопитающих/Левенец Я.В., Пантелеева С.Н., Резникова Ж.И. // Экспериментальная психология.–2016.– № 4..–С. 68–78.
135. Левенец Я.В. Экспериментальное исследование питания насекомыми у грызунов / Левенец Я.В., Пантелеева С.Н., Резникова Ж.И. // Евразиатский энтомологический журнал.–2016.– № 6.– С. 550–554.
136. Экспериментальный сравнительный анализ охотничьего поведения четырех видов хомячков подсемейства Сricetinae/ Левенец Я.В., Пантелеева С.Н., Резникова Ж.И. [и др.].// Зоологический журнал.–2019ю– № 6.–. С. 1–11
137. Пантелеева С. Н. Экспериментальное исследование охотничьего поведения скальных полевок Alticola strelzowi и Alticola tuvinicus (Rodentia, Cricetidae)/ Пантелеева С. Н., Левенец Я. В., Новиковская А. А. [и др.].// Зоологический журнал.– 2020.– № 1.–С. 113–120.
138. Поликарпов И.А. Энергообмен у мышевидных грызунов различной экологической специализации/ Поликарпов И.А. Новиков Е.А.// Вестник ИрГСХ.– 2017.– № 82.– С. 145–152.
139. Meek E.C. In vitro age–related differences in rats to organophosphates/ Meek E.C., Carr R.L., Chambers J.E. // Toxicol. In Vitro.– 2021.– N 72.–P.105102.
140. Expression of a dominant negative CELF protein in vivo leads to altered muscle organization, fiber size, and subtype/ Berger D.S., Moyer M., Kliment G.M. [et al.].// PLoS One.– 2011.– N 6(4).–P.19274.
141. Dynamics of testosterone concentration in male steppe lemmings (Lagurus lagurus) in the reproductive cycle reflects the species–specific mating system/Potapova O. F., Potapov M. A., Kondratyuk E. Yu. Evsikov V. I.//Doklady Biological Sciences.–2016.– N468.–P.146–148.